⇆ Platforms & Cloud

Cloud AI migrations

Moving AI workloads between Azure OpenAI, AWS Bedrock, Google Vertex AI, direct APIs and self-hosted models.

Pick where your AI workloads run today and where you want to go. We’ll show why teams make that move, what to watch out for and how we de-risk it.

Azure OpenAI / AI Foundry

Why teams move here
  • Microsoft enterprise agreement or Azure commitment to consume
  • OpenAI models with Microsoft enterprise, compliance and EU data-boundary terms
  • Native fit with Entra ID, Microsoft 365, Copilot and Fabric
When leaving it, watch for
  • Replace Azure-specific content-filter configurations with equivalent guardrails
  • Provisioned throughput (PTU) commitments and quotas to wind down
  • Features tied to Azure AI Search or Foundry agents need an equivalent on the target

AWS Bedrock

Why teams move here
  • Consolidate on AWS and use existing commitments and security controls
  • Wide model choice in one API: Anthropic Claude, Meta Llama, Mistral, Amazon Nova and more
  • VPC endpoints, IAM and Bedrock Guardrails in the same account model as your apps
When leaving it, watch for
  • Bedrock Knowledge Bases and Agents are managed features; rebuild or map them
  • Provisioned throughput contracts to plan around
  • IAM-based auth patterns change to the target’s identity model

Google Vertex AI

Why teams move here
  • Gemini models with long context and strong multimodal capabilities
  • Data gravity: analytics already live in BigQuery
  • Partner models (including Claude) with Google Cloud commitments and VPC Service Controls
When leaving it, watch for
  • Vertex AI Search / Agent Builder features need an equivalent on the target
  • Gemini-specific capabilities (very long context, native multimodal) must be re-validated
  • Service-account-based auth and perimeter rules to re-create

Direct model APIs (OpenAI, Anthropic, Mistral…)

Why teams move here
  • Newest models and features usually arrive first
  • Simplest setup for startups and fast-moving product teams
  • Fewer cloud quota requests and regional constraints
When leaving it, watch for
  • Rate limits and data-processing terms differ from the cloud-hosted versions
  • Provider-specific APIs (e.g. built-in tools, file search) need equivalents
  • Billing and usage tracking move into your cloud bill and gateway

Self-hosted open models

Why teams move here
  • Full data sovereignty: nothing leaves your environment
  • Lower unit cost at high, steady volume
  • Deep customisation through fine-tuning and distillation
When leaving it, watch for
  • You give up operating GPUs; capacity planning becomes the provider’s job
  • Fine-tuned weights may not be portable; managed fine-tuning may be needed
  • Check data-processing terms meet the same requirements as self-hosting

What always changes

  • Model mapping and prompt re-tuning: the same prompt behaves differently on another model
  • Embeddings are not portable: vector stores must be re-embedded and re-indexed
  • SDKs, auth, networking (private endpoints) and IAM differ per provider
  • Quotas, throughput reservations and regional availability
  • Safety filters and guardrail settings
  • Fine-tuned models must be re-trained on the target
  • Logging, monitoring and cost attribution

How we de-risk it

Next step

Let's talk about your AI system.

A free 30-minute call with an Engagement Lead or AI Architect. You'll leave with a clearer view of options, risks and cost, whether or not we work together. Your case doesn't need to fit any box on this site; just tell us what you're facing.